Aeroelastic behaviour of urban air mobility aircraft with distributedelectric propulsion subjected to urban wind gusts
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The goal of this project is to perform a parametric study on the aeroelastic behaviour of an urban air mobility (UAM) vehicle with a distributed electric propulsion (DEP) system, subjected to urban environment and to showcase the most important parameters.The study focuses on the stability analysis and time response of a wing with distributed propellers.With the increasing density of city populations, it is becoming more challenging to navigate through daily activities, leading the aerospace industry to explore environmentally friendly and economically accessible solutions such as flying taxis, also known as UAM vehicles.This solution has the benefits of increasing accessibility, safety, urban mobility, and reliability and reducing travel time and environmental impacts.However, the aeroelastic behaviour of UAM vehicles is still not fully understood, particularly since they fly in urban areas with increased turbulence and wind gusts.Additionally, contrary to conventional aircraft, UAM vehicles have the particularity of using DEP systems, affecting the distribution of force, mass, and moment of inertia along the wingspan.These aspects may be detrimental to the aircraft if the structural and propulsion parameters of the system are not suitably considered.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.003 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".