MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4389541015 · doi:10.17118/11143/20997

Modelling of heat transfer in an enclosed two-phase dielectric immersioncooling system for electronic components

2023· article· en· W4389541015 on OpenAlex
Gabriel Parent, Omidreza Ghaffari, Francis Grenier, Simon Jasmin, Luc G. Fréchette, Julien Sylvestre

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicMechanical and Thermal Properties Analysis
Canadian institutionsUniversité de Sherbrooke
Fundersnot available
KeywordsImmersion (mathematics)DielectricHeat transferMaterials scienceMechanical engineeringComposite materialElectrical engineeringMechanicsOptoelectronicsPhysicsEngineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract: Electronic components, such as high-performance processors for data centres, are becoming increasingly powerful and generate large quantities of heat. The 2022 International Technology Roadmap for Devices and Systems projects that the maximum thermal design power for individual chip socket will increase from 300 W in 2022 to 700 W in 2032. Thermal management of these components has been a major performance bottleneck for years. Two-phase dielectric immersion is a cooling solution that could provide the cooling capacity required for future high performances electronics. The current study is part of an effort to develop a closed two-phase dielectric immersion cooling system for high-performance processors. The system studied was a chamber filled with a dielectric fluid, that had a heating element at the bottom on which boiling occurred. At the top of the chamber was a heat sink cooled by a water-fed cold plate on which condensation occurred. An experimental prototype was built to evaluate the impact of important operating parameters on the thermal performances of the cooling system. The operating parameters chosen were the filling ratio of the chamber, the flow rate and the inlet temperature of the water circulating in the cold plate. The temperature and the pressure inside the chamber were measured. In each set of tests, the power supplied to the heating element was increased until the maximum pressure limit of the system was reached. The objective of the study was to develop a model based on basic principles and equations to calculate the temperature and the pressure inside the chamber as a function of the power supplied the heating element. To model was used to provide insights on how the operating parameters had an impact on the thermal performances of the system. The output of the model was close to the experimental data. The transient temperature and pressure profiles inside the chamber calculated with the model matched the experimental data with less than 10% of error. The impact of the filling ratio on the overall thermal resistance was negligible. The cold plate flow rate and temperature both had a significant impact on the thermal performances. A higher flow rate and a lower temperature led to a lower overall thermal resistance. The model was developed for the condensation assembly used in the experimental setup due to the complexity of the condensation in a closed chamber with boiling a dielectric fluid.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.275
Threshold uncertainty score0.369

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.040
GPT teacher head0.245
Teacher spread0.205 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it