Analytical and CFD analysis of a heat generator to match a vertical axiswind turbine
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract: In cold climates, such as in Canada, a major part of consumed energy in the residential sector is in the form of heat, so developing a technology to convert wind energy, which is considered a sustainable resource, directly into heat will be attractive from both efficiency and economic standpoints. In this paper, we apply agitation technology, a widely-used method in industrial processes, to design a heat generator that can directly convert wind kinetic energy into thermal energy using a 12KW vertical axis wind turbine. Furthermore, based on the geometry of an agitator tank, a CFD analysis was performed to predict the flow characteristics. This study considers different flow variables, including radial velocity, turbulent kinetic energy, and turbulent kinetic energy dissipation rate. Moreover, the effect of viscous dissipation on the fluid temperature rise was assessed. The obtained results revealed that the designed agitator perfectly matches a wind turbine operating in a steady-state condition to generate maximum heat energy.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".