MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4389541274 · doi:10.17118/11143/20831

Improving radiative cooling performance by implementing underside IRreflectors

2023· article· en· W4389541274 on OpenAlexaff
Atousa Pirvaram, Nima Talebzadeh, Siu N. Leung, Paul G. O’Brien

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicRadiative Heat Transfer Studies
Canadian institutionsYork University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsRadiative coolingRadiative transferComputer scienceEnvironmental scienceRemote sensingOpticsPhysicsMeteorologyGeology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The rapid development of urbanization and global warming have led to a dramatic increase in global energy demands for cooling.Conventional cooling systems are energy intensive, cause significant amounts of greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions, and add to the urban heat island effect, which further increases cooling demands.It has been estimated that about 40% of primary energy is used in buildings, most of which is used to operate heating, ventilation, and air conditioning systems.Radiative cooling (RC) is an effective passive cooling technique that does not require any energy input during operation and thus can mitigate GHG emissions released by conventional cooling devices.RC technology takes advantage of the fact that the atmosphere is highly transparent over the spectral range from 8 -13 m, which is referred to as the atmospheric window.In RC technology a sky-facing surface with a high emissivity over the atmospheric window can conduct radiative heat exchange with outer space which is at a temperature of 3 K.However, limited sky-facing area, especially in multistorey buildings, prevents widespread use of RC technologies.Presently RC systems focus on radiative cooling from the top sky-facing surfaces while other surfaces, especially the bottom surfaces, do not contribute to the RC effect.The objective of the research presented herein is to boost the performance of RC structures by placing an IR reflector beneath their bottom surfaces such that they can be cooled from the bottom as well as the upper sky-facing side.In this study, the cooling performance of a RC structure is simulated for three different cases wherein a different surface resides beneath the RC structure for each case.In Case 1 the underlying surface has the properties of a blackbody.In Case 2 the underlying surface is a 1m-by-1m flat reflector and in Case 3 the underlying surface is an infinitely wide underlying reflector.This work provides a wide-ranging analytical assessment of the RC performance for the above-mentioned three cases.The effects of the spectral reflective properties of the underlying reflector, solar absorbance in the RC structure, and convective heat loss to the surroundings on the cooling power of the RC structure are investigated.Numerical analysis shows that for an ambient temperature of 300 K under ideal conditions, in the absence of incident solar energy and convective heat transfer with the surroundings, the steady-state temperatures for Cases 2 and 3 are 245 K and 244 K, respectively, which are substantially lower than that for Case 1, which is 277 K.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.677
Threshold uncertainty score0.725

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.016
GPT teacher head0.236
Teacher spread0.220 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2023
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicRadiative Heat Transfer StudiesFrench-language works237,207