MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4389541464 · doi:10.17118/11143/20850

Tracking tracer particles in subsonic, transonic and supersonic flowspast a circular cylinder

2023· article· en· W4389541464 on OpenAlexaff
Xiaohua Wu, Huiying Zhang, J. M. Wallace

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicPlasma and Flow Control in Aerodynamics
Canadian institutionsQueen's UniversityRoyal Military College of Canada
Fundersnot available
KeywordsTransonicSupersonic speedTracking (education)TRACERCylinderMechanicsSubsonic and transonic wind tunnelAerospace engineeringPhysicsAerodynamicsEngineeringMechanical engineeringNuclear physics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

An overwhelmingly extensive volume of literature exists on tracking fluid tracer particles and inertial solid particles in isotropic turbulence, channel flow, mixing layer, jets and flat-plate boundary layer.In sharp contrast, only very few studies, all limited in the very-low Reynolds number and incompressible regime, were reported on particle tracking in flows past a circular cylinder.In this study, we report direct numerical simulation (DNS) tracking of fluid tracer particles in subsonic, transonic and supersonic flows past a circular cylinder over a much higher Reynolds number range.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.460
Threshold uncertainty score0.684

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.012
GPT teacher head0.199
Teacher spread0.186 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2023
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicPlasma and Flow Control in AerodynamicsFrench-language works237,207