Behavior of an anchored sheet pile quay in soft clay reinforced by various structural types of cemented soil
Bibliographic record
Abstract
In this research, the potential benefits of using various structural types of cemented soil, including block-type, column-type, and wall-type, to reinforce the active zone behind a quay wall were investigated by experimental and numerical methods. The response of the quay wall and ground was analysed from aspects of soil movement, quay wall displacement, lateral earth pressure, and bending moment, and a close agreement between the experimental and numerical results was observed. Experimental and numerical results showed that the cemented soil effectively prevented potential deep soil sliding, and then lateral displacement of the quay wall and ground deformation was reduced. Among various structural patterns, the case with the block-type cemented soil exhibited smaller lateral earth pressure on the quay wall, while the case with the wall-type cemented soil more effectively reduced the bending moments and lateral displacements of the quay wall; therefore, wall-type cemented soil seems to be more favourable considering their improved performance under the same load intensities and excavation depth. This research provides a hint and guideline for the preliminary design of cemented soil-stabilised sheet pile quay structures in soft clay based on the lateral load-reduction effect of the varying structural types of the cemented soil.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".