MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort

Hardware-Efficient 1D CNN for Patient-Specific Early Seizure Detection

2023· article· en· W4389542365 on OpenAlexaff
Zhiyu Yang, Jamie Koerner, Gerard O’Leary, Taufik A. Valiante, Roman Genov

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldNeuroscience
TopicEEG and Brain-Computer Interfaces
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Toronto
FundersBeijing Institute of Technology
KeywordsChainingComputer scienceInitializationConvolutional neural networkFeature extractionNeuromodulationArtificial intelligenceDeep learningFeature (linguistics)EpilepsyPattern recognition (psychology)Computer engineeringNeuroscience

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Closed-loop brain-implantable neuromodulation devices are a new treatment option for patients with refractory epilepsy. Seizure detection algorithms implemented on such devices are subject to strict power and area constraints. Deep learning methods, though very powerful, tend to have high computational complexity and thus are typically impractical for resource-constrained neuromodulation devices. In this paper, we propose a compact and hardware-efficient one-dimensional convolutional neural network (1D CNN) structure for patient-specific early seizure detection. Feature extraction techniques and a novel initialization method based on the forward-chaining training and testing scheme are used to improve model performance. Our compact model achieves similar accuracy to that of support vector machines, the state-of-the-art method for seizure detection, while consuming over 20x less power.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.006

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.038
GPT teacher head0.264
Teacher spread0.227 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2023
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicEEG and Brain-Computer Interfaces→French-language works237,207→