MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4389542579 · doi:10.1039/d3qi01769a

Optimizing Bi active sites by Ce doping for boosting formate production in a wide potential window

2023· article· en· W4389542579 on OpenAlexafffund
Yicheng Wang, Peng‐Fei Sui, Chenyu Xu, Mengnan Zhu, Renfei Feng, Hongtao Ma, Hongbo Zeng, Xiaolei Wang, Jing‐Li Luo

Bibliographic record

VenueInorganic Chemistry Frontiers · 2023
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEnergy
TopicCO2 Reduction Techniques and Catalysts
Canadian institutionsCanadian Light Source (Canada)University of Alberta
FundersCanada First Research Excellence FundChina Scholarship CouncilNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaGovernment of Canada
KeywordsFormateDopingFaraday efficiencyPyrolysisMaterials scienceCatalysisBoosting (machine learning)Inorganic chemistryChemical engineeringChemistryOptoelectronicsPhysical chemistryElectrochemistryElectrodeComputer scienceOrganic chemistry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Ce x Bi 1− x @C NRs were obtained by the pyrolysis method. Catalysts show desirable faradaic efficiencies of over 90% towards formate formation in a wide potential window from −0.9 to −1.9 V vs . RHE , with the maximum value of 96.1%.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.038
Threshold uncertainty score0.939

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.008
GPT teacher head0.223
Teacher spread0.215 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations10
Published2023
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueInorganic Chemistry FrontiersSame topicCO2 Reduction Techniques and CatalystsFrench-language works237,207