MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Detection of spreading depression features from the scalp of epileptic patients

2023· article· en· W4389542855 on OpenAlexaff
Zoya Bastany, Shahbaz Askari, Ali Gorji, Guy A. Dumont

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldNeuroscience
TopicEEG and Brain-Computer Interfaces
Canadian institutionsInternational Collaboration On Repair DiscoveriesBC Children's HospitalUniversity of British Columbia
Fundersnot available
KeywordsElectroencephalographyEpilepsyScalpCortical spreading depressionElectrocorticographyNeuroscienceBiomarkerMicrodialysisMedicineAnesthesiaPsychologyChemistryCentral nervous systemSurgery

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Spreading depression (SD), a pathological cortical negative DC potential, is caused by an elevation of potassium ions in the extracellular space. This leads to a transient relocation of ions within neurons and a slow spread through brain tissue. Our previous research established a correlation between scalp SD and seizures in patients with intractable epilepsy using our novel electroencephalography (EEG). In this study, we enhanced our EEG system by incorporating a Near-infrared spectroscopy (NIRS) module for multi-modal EEG-NIRS measurements. The aim is to provide an investigation into the defining characteristics and methods for detecting SD.Clinical Relevance-: The detection of SD serves as a novel biomarker for epilepsy, capable of forewarning seizures within a time range from 10 secs to 30 min. This detection plays a crucial role in predicting and preventing seizures and providing diagnostic information for drug-resistant epilepsy patients.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.003

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.020
GPT teacher head0.258
Teacher spread0.238 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2023
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicEEG and Brain-Computer InterfacesFrench-language works237,207