MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort

Atypical structural connectome asymmetry and associations with network communication in autism spectrum disorder

2023· article· en· W4389543068 on OpenAlexaff
Seulki Yoo, Yurim Jang, Seok‐Jun Hong, Hyunjin Park, Sofie L. Valk, Boris C. Bernhardt, Bo‐yong Park

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldNeuroscience
TopicFunctional Brain Connectivity Studies
Canadian institutionsMcGill UniversityMontreal Neurological Institute and Hospital
FundersInstitute for Basic ScienceNational Research Foundation
KeywordsConnectomeNeurotypicalAutism spectrum disorderAutismNeurosciencePsychologyNeurodevelopmental disorderFunctional connectivityDevelopmental psychology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Autism spectrum disorder is a common neurodevelopmental condition showing connectome disorganization in sensory and transmodal cortices. However, alterations in the inter-hemispheric asymmetry of structural connectome are remained to be investigated. Here, we studied structural connectome asymmetry in individuals with autism using dimensionality reduction techniques and assessed its topological underpinnings by associating with network communication measures. We found that the sensory and heteromodal association regions showed significant between-group differences in inter-hemispheric asymmetry between individuals with autism and neurotypical controls. In addition, the network communication ability was particularly altered between visual and limbic areas. Our findings provide insights for understanding structural connectome alteration in autism and its topological underpinnings.Clinical Relevance- This study provides insights into the understanding of atypical macroscale structural connectome organization in individuals with autism.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.006

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.024
GPT teacher head0.268
Teacher spread0.244 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2023
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicFunctional Brain Connectivity Studies→French-language works237,207→