MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Opportunities and challenges for robotic-assisted spine surgery: feasible indications for the MAZOR™ X Stealth Edition

2023· article· en· W4389543128 on OpenAlexaffabout
Mary K. McIntosh, Sean Christie

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicSpinal Fractures and Fixation Techniques
Canadian institutionsDalhousie University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsDisseminationMedical physicsArtificial intelligenceComputer scienceMedicineTelecommunications

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The clinical use of new technologies has several potential benefits including improved accuracy, precision and efficiency. Robotic assistance during surgery is one such technology and it is making its way into neurosurgical operating rooms with increasing frequency. The Mazor X™Stealth robot was first used in Canada for spine surgery during July 2022 and since then multiple indications for its use have been identified and evaluated.The outcomes of robot-assisted spine surgery have been promising but there is a lack of supportive studies which would serve to refine indications, establish protocols and disseminate practical information. To begin filling this gap we gathered a list of use-cases for which this new technology was successfully employed. In combination with cases that took place in our Centre, we reviewed the existing reported uses of the Mazor X™Stealth for spine surgery and recorded their respective procedures and outcomes for patients and surgeons.Through this review we identified common uses of the Mazor X™Stealth for spine surgery. Usage of robotic-assisted technology had a net positive impact on outcomes for patients as well as surgeons (e.g., improved accuracy of pedicle screw placement and reduced radiation burden). This curation remains a dynamic list, and we foresee the addition of more indications in the future.Clinical Relevance— Enabling the use of technology including robotic systems has the potential to attract clinical research expertise, reduce resource usage and to improve surgical outcomes.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.004
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.006
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.004
Threshold uncertainty score0.019

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0040.006
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.001
Bibliometrics0.0030.002
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0020.004
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0040.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.292
GPT teacher head0.374
Teacher spread0.083 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations4
Published2023
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicSpinal Fractures and Fixation TechniquesFrench-language works237,207