Application of ZnO Nanoparticles Encapsulated in Mesoporous Silica on the Abaxial Side of a <i>Solanum lycopersicum</i> Leaf Enhances Zn Uptake and Translocation via the Phloem
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
High Resolution Image Download MS PowerPoint Slide Foliar application of nutrient nanoparticles (NPs) is a promising strategy for improving fertilization efficiency in agriculture. Phloem translocation of NPs from leaves is required for efficient fertilization but is currently considered to be feasible only for NPs smaller than a cell wall pore size exclusion limit of <20 nm. Using mass spectrometry imaging, we provide here the first direct evidence for phloem localization and translocation of a larger (∼70 nm) fertilizer NP comprised of ZnO encapsulated in mesoporous SiO 2 (ZnO@MSN) following foliar deposition. The Si content in the phloem tissue of the petiole connected to the dosed leaf was ∼10 times higher than in the xylem tissue, and ∼100 times higher than the phloem tissue of an untreated tomato plant petiole. Direct evidence of NPs in individual phloem cells has only previously been shown for smaller NPs introduced invasively in the plant. Furthermore, we show that uptake and translocation of the NPs can be enhanced by their application on the abaxial (lower) side of the leaf. Applying ZnO@MSN to the abaxial side of a single leaf resulted in a 56% higher uptake of Zn as well as higher translocation to the younger (upper) leaves and to the roots, than dosing the adaxial (top) side of a leaf. The higher abaxial uptake of NPs is in alignment with the higher stomatal density and lower density of mesophyll tissues on that side and has not been demonstrated before.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it