Vehicular Multimodal Motion Forecasting via Conditional Score-based Modeling
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Accurately forecasting the future motions of road participants is essential for proactive hazard avoidance and safety planning of autonomous vehicles. Existing methods for motion prediction based on probabilistic generative models are limited to low-accuracy likelihood calculations and relatively finite mode distributions. Recent studies show that score-based models can naturally overcome these limitations. In this work, we present a novel paradigm of conditional score-based models for vehicle motion prediction, called Motion-CSM. First, we model scene contextual representations of interaction regions at the feature level via graph convolutional networks. We then interpolate these representations as conditions into the solution process of the continuous-time reverse stochastic differential equation (SDE) to guide trajectory generation, which progressively converts the known prior distributions into multimodal trajectories including the ground truth modes. The designed stacked Transformer structure with dual control conditions is adopted to learn the score function approximation of the Gaussian perturbation kernel. Finally, we develop multiple consistency constraints to align the inference results of Motion-CSM in reverse SDE solving to improve the self-consistency and stability of multimodal trajectory generation. Experimental results on the real-world motion dataset demonstrate that the multimodal forecasting accuracy of Motion-CSM outperforms state-of-the-art methods.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".