MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4389548431 · doi:10.3390/computation11120253

Mathematical Model for Chemical Reactions in Electrolytes Applied to Cytochrome c Oxidase: An Electro-Osmotic Approach

2023· article· en· W4389548431 on OpenAlexafffund
Shixin Xu, Bob Eisenberg, Zilong Song, Huaxiong Huang

Bibliographic record

VenueComputation · 2023
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldNeuroscience
TopicPhotoreceptor and optogenetics research
Canadian institutionsYork University
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaNational Natural Science Foundation of ChinaAmerican Institute of Mathematics
KeywordsDissipative systemChemical energyCytochrome c oxidaseChemistryElectron transport chainElectrolyteChemical physicsPhysicsThermodynamicsStatistical physicsMitochondrionPhysical chemistryElectrode

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This study introduces a mathematical model for electrolytic chemical reactions, employing an energy variation approach grounded in classical thermodynamics. Our model combines electrostatics and chemical reactions within well-defined energetic and dissipative functionals. Extending the energy variation method to open systems consisting of charge, mass, and energy inputs, this model explores energy transformation from one form to another. Electronic devices and biological channels and transporters are open systems. By applying this generalized approach, we investigate the conversion of an electrical current to a proton flow by cytochrome c oxidase, a vital mitochondrial enzyme contributing to ATP production, the ‘energetic currency of life’. This model shows how the enzyme’s structure directs currents and mass flows governed by energetic and dissipative functionals. The interplay between electron and proton flows, guided by Kirchhoff’s current law within the mitochondrial membrane and the mitochondria itself, determines the function of the systems, where electron flows are converted into proton flows and gradients. This important biological system serves as a practical example of the use of energy variation methods to deal with electrochemical reactions in open systems. We combine chemical reactions and Kirchhoff’s law in a model that is much simpler to implement than a full accounting of all the charges in a chemical system.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.003
Threshold uncertainty score0.010

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.002
Open science0.0020.001
Research integrity0.0020.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.103
GPT teacher head0.372
Teacher spread0.269 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations9
Published2023
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueComputationSame topicPhotoreceptor and optogenetics researchFrench-language works237,207