MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4389548634 · doi:10.1103/physrevd.108.123517

Hyper Suprime-Cam Year 3 results: Cosmology from galaxy clustering and weak lensing with HSC and SDSS using the emulator based halo model

2023· article· en· W4389548634 on OpenAlexfundno aff
Hironao Miyatake, Sunao Sugiyama, Masahiro Takada, Takahiro Nishimichi, Xiangchong Li, Masato Shirasaki, Surhud More, Yosuke Kobayashi, Atsushi J. Nishizawa, Markus Michael Rau, Tianqing Zhang, Ryuichi Takahashi, Roohi Dalal, Rachel Mandelbaum, Michael A. Strauss, Takashi Hamana, Masamune Oguri, Ken Osato, Wentao Luo, Arun Kannawadi, Bau-Ching Hsieh, Robert Armstrong, James Bosch, Yutaka Komiyama, Robert H. Lupton, Nate B. Lust, Lauren A. MacArthur, Satoshi Miyazaki, Hitoshi Murayama, Yuki Okura, P. A. Price, Tomomi Sunayama, Philip J. Tait, Masayuki Tanaka, Shiang‐Yu Wang

Bibliographic record

VenuePhysical review. D/Physical review. D. · 2023
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicGalaxies: Formation, Evolution, Phenomena
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersPlanetary Science DivisionFundamental Research Funds for the Central UniversitiesJapan Society for the Promotion of ScienceScience Mission DirectorateSmithsonian Astrophysical ObservatoryEötvös Loránd TudományegyetemNational Astronomical Observatory of JapanNational Central UniversityMinistry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science and TechnologyQueen's UniversityCore Research for Evolutional Science and TechnologyCabinet Office, Government of JapanAcademia SinicaQueen's University BelfastNational Key Research and Development Program of ChinaSpace Telescope Science InstituteToray Science FoundationHigher Education Discipline Innovation ProjectUniversity of TokyoHigh Energy Accelerator Research OrganizationMax-Planck-Institut für AstronomieUniversity of EdinburghLos Alamos National LaboratoryPrinceton UniversityJohns Hopkins UniversityJapan Science and Technology AgencySmithsonian InstitutionNational Natural Science Foundation of ChinaUniversity of Hawai'iMax-Planck-GesellschaftSimons FoundationDurham UniversityUniversity of MarylandNational Aeronautics and Space AdministrationDavid and Lucile Packard FoundationNational Science Foundation
KeywordsPhysicsAstrophysicsGalaxyCosmologyRedshiftPhotometric redshiftHaloWeak gravitational lensingSkyLuminosityAstronomy

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

A new analysis of the distribution of matter in the Universe continues to find a discrepancy in the clumpiness of dark matter in the late and early Universe, suggesting a fundamental error in the standard cosmological model.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.003
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.005
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.024
Threshold uncertainty score0.047

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0030.005
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0020.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0100.002

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.022
GPT teacher head0.345
Teacher spread0.322 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations78
Published2023
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuePhysical review. D/Physical review. D.Same topicGalaxies: Formation, Evolution, PhenomenaFrench-language works237,207