MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Archetype Building Energy Models for Residential Sector: Importance of Uncontrolled Inputs in Predictive Control and Energy Flexibility

2023· article· en· W4389558558 on OpenAlexaffabout
Seyyed Morteza Abtahi, Andreas Athienitis, Benoit Delcroix

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Physics Conference Series · 2023
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicBuilding Energy and Comfort Optimization
Canadian institutionsHydro-QuébecConcordia University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsModel predictive controlFlexibility (engineering)ArchetypeElectricityComputer scienceMeteorologyEnvironmental scienceEngineeringControl (management)MathematicsStatisticsArtificial intelligenceElectrical engineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract A 1st-order gray-box archetype is developed using high-quality measurements from an unoccupied experimental house to investigate the sensitivity of economic model-based predictive control performance under Québec’s dynamic electricity tariff for the residential sector, rate Flex-D, to uncertainty in the weather forecast. The archetype incorporates the outside air temperature and the solar gain as uncontrolled heat sources and has three parameters: the overall thermal capacitance, the thermal resistance to the outside air temperature, and the solar aperture. The performance of economic model-based predictive control is compared under the uncertain day-ahead forecast and the historical measurements of the same day. The results show that the most influential uncontrolled input directing the performance of economic model-based predictive control under rate Flex-D is the price signal, which makes the impact of uncertainty in the weather forecast almost negligible.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.062
Threshold uncertainty score0.123

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.019
GPT teacher head0.231
Teacher spread0.212 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2023
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Physics Conference SeriesSame topicBuilding Energy and Comfort OptimizationFrench-language works237,207