MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4389562101 · doi:10.1063/5.0177630

On the internal velocity structure of sub-aqueous, gravity-driven granular flow: Measurements using MHz frequency sound

2023· article· en· W4389562101 on OpenAlexafffund
Jenna Hare, Alex E. Hay

Bibliographic record

VenuePhysics of Fluids · 2023
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicGranular flow and fluidized beds
Canadian institutionsDalhousie University
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
KeywordsShear velocityGranular layerPhysicsSpeed of soundFlow velocityMechanicsFlow (mathematics)TurbulenceThermodynamics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The vertical structure of downslope velocity within sub-aqueous gravity-driven flows of (smoother) glass beads and (rougher) natural sand is investigated for both fixed roughness and erodible beds using high-resolution, MHz-frequency acoustics. The observed velocity profiles within the O(1) cm thick, O(10) cm/s flows exhibit a negative shear layer extending downward from the sediment–water interface to a velocity maximum at ∼ 9 grain diameters depth within the layer, below which the velocities decrease to near-zero values at the pre-flow bed location for fixed roughness beds and to non-zero values for mobile beds. The attenuation of sound transmitted through the moving layer is used to constrain the depth-averaged solids concentration to a value of ∼ 0.52. The observed negative shear at the interface indicates that, unlike the sub-aerial case, interfacial friction is dynamically important in gravity-driven sub-aqueous granular flows. It is shown that the observed vertical structure of velocity within the layer can be well represented by continuum viscous flow models. Solids concentration and effective viscosity are estimated from the best-fit model parameters using the Zarraga–Hill–Leighton (2000) empirical relation for suspensions of negatively buoyant particles, yielding vertically averaged values ∼ 0.57. While the sub-millimeter vertical resolution of the measurements is too coarse to provide precise estimates of the friction velocity at the interface, the model-data comparisons nevertheless indicate that the vertical structure of the downslope flow consists of a weakly stratified dense layer and a thin, dilute transition layer between the dense flow and the overlying water.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.003
Threshold uncertainty score0.007

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.032
GPT teacher head0.242
Teacher spread0.210 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2023
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuePhysics of FluidsSame topicGranular flow and fluidized bedsFrench-language works237,207