MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W4389562591 · doi:10.7185/gold2023.17152

Early Earth’s hydrosphere: insights from the hydrothermally altered submarine lavas of the Eoarchean Saglek-Hebron Complex, Canada

2023· article· en· W4389562591 on OpenAlexaffabout
Anton V. Kutyrev, Ilya N. Bindeman, Jonathan OʼNeil, Hanika Rizo

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEarth and Planetary Sciences
TopicGeology and Paleoclimatology Research
Canadian institutionsCarleton UniversityUniversity of Ottawa
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHydrosphereSubmarineGeologyEarth (classical element)AstrobiologyEarth scienceOceanographyBiosphereEcologyPhysics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Estimating Earth's earliest hydrosphere conditions, including its temperature and isotopic composition, requires a rock whose protolith is robust enough to broadly preserve the O isotope data for billions of years despite isochemical metamorphism [1,2]. Numerous studies use zircon isotopic compositions [3] although zircons provide indirect and distant evidence of interaction between Hadean and Eoarchean rocks and the ancient hydrosphere. We here offer a direct investigation of rare outcrops of Hadean-Eorchaean age in Saglek-Hebron Complex in Northern Labrador, Canada ~3.8 Ga. We investigated a multitude of coeval rocks (basaltic pillows, dikes, sediments) mapped and previously well characterized compositionally and isotopically. These rocks are interpreted to represent submarine basalts and peridotites, with possible metakomatiites, are currently metamorphozed to amphibolite to granulite facies, and covered by metasedimentary rocks. We performed modeling of the metamorphic cycle on O and H isotopes and discuss the spatial distribution of O isotopic values.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.046
Threshold uncertainty score0.093

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0020.002
Science and technology studies0.0020.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.024
GPT teacher head0.210
Teacher spread0.187 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2023
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicGeology and Paleoclimatology Research→French-language works237,207→