Uncovering network mechanism underlying thalamic deep brain stimulation
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract Thalamic ventral intermediate nucleus (Vim) is the primary surgical target of deep brain stimulation (DBS) for reducing symptoms of essential tremor. High-frequency Vim-DBS (≥100Hz) has been clinically effective, generating two experimentally-observed features in Vim spiking activity: 1) a large transient excitatory response (lasting <1s), followed by 2) a suppressed steady-state consisting of oscillations. Yet, mechanisms underlying these observations have not been fully understood by previous studies. In this work, we developed a network rate model and a novel parameter optimization method that accurately fit in-vivo single-unit recordings of Vim in human patients with essential tremor receiving a wide range of DBS frequencies (5∼200Hz). Our model incorporates both the DBS-induced synaptic plasticity of Vim neurons, and the recurrent connections among excitatory and inhibitory neurons in Vim-network. We hypothesized that besides inducing synaptic depression, the therapeutic mechanism of high-frequency Vim-DBS could be to engage more inhibitory neurons in stabilizing the underlying circuits. Graphical abstract
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.004 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".