A Novel Mutation in Sacsin, p.Val1335IIe, May Cause Late-Onset Sacsinopathy Due to Haploinsufficiency
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Autosomal recessive spastic ataxia in Charlevoix-Saguenay (ARSACS) is a neurodegenerative disorder caused by mutations in the sacsin molecular chaperone protein (SACS) gene. Since the first report from Quebec in 1978, many pathogenic ARSACS variants with significantly reduced chaperone activities have been reported worldwide in adolescents, with presumably altered protein folding. In this study, a novel SACS mutation (p.Val1335IIe, Heterozygous) was identified in a Korean patient in their 50s with late-onset ARSACS characterized by cerebellar ataxia and spasticity without peripheral neuropathy. The mutation was confirmed via whole exome sequencing and Sanger sequencing and was predicted to likely cause disease using prediction software. RT-PCR and ELISA showed decreased SACS mRNA expression and sacsin protein concentrations in the proband, supporting its implications in diseases with pathogenicity and reduced chaperone function from haploinsufficiency. Our results revealed the pathogenicity of the SACS Val1335IIe mutation in the proband patient’s disease manifestation, even though the symptoms had a limited correlation with the typical ARSACS clinical triad, which could be due to the reduced chaperon function from haploinsufficiency. Furthermore, our study suggests that variants of SACS heterozygosity may have diverse symptoms, with a wide range of disease onsets for late-onset sacsinopathy.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".