MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4389575128 · doi:10.33920/med-01-2311-01

Attitude to the disease and quality of life in elderly patients with mild vascular dementia after the novel coronavirus infection

2023· article· en· W4389575128 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
N.M. Zalutskaya, I.I. Khyanikyaynen, Anna Anatoljevna Dmitryakova

Bibliographic record

VenueVestnik nevrologii psihiatrii i nejrohirurgii (Bulletin of Neurology Psychiatry and Neurosurgery) · 2023
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicLong-Term Effects of COVID-19
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsDementiaMontreal Cognitive AssessmentMedicineRating scaleQuality of life (healthcare)Clinical Dementia RatingDiseaseDepression (economics)Internal medicineGerontologyPhysical therapyPsychology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In order to study the types of attitude towards the disease and quality of life (QoL) in elderly patients with mild vascular dementia (MVD) living in the conditions of the psychoneurological institution Social Service House “Severnoye Izmailovo” in Moscow, there were 2 study groups: the patients with the clinical debut of the novel coronavirus infection (NCVI) of 6 months +/– 1 month with the recovery outcome (n=65; 33 men, 32 women) and those who did not have COVID-19 (hospital control group; n=67; 34 men, 33 women). The mean age of the studied patients was 73.05±3.48 years. The age and sex composition of the two groups was homogeneous (p>0.05). Emotional disorders were investigated using the Cornell Scale for Depression in Dementia (CSDD); cognitive disorders – by means of the Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA); QoL – by the Quality of Life in Alzheimer's Disease scale (QoL-AD): QoL self-assessment (QoL-AD-SR (self-rating)) and proxy QoL rating (QoL-AD-PR (proxy rating)); the type of attitude towards the disease – by the TATD scale (Wasserman L.I. et al., 2005). It was found that COVID-19 aggravates cognitive deficits in patients with MVD (according to MoCA 20.80±0.59 /21.40±0.78 points; p<0.05) in the absence of depression (according to CSDD 1.52±0.50 / 1.52±0.84 points in the group of the patients after NCVI / hospital control group, respectively; p>0.05). In the patients after COVID-19, a correlation was found between the proxy QoL rating and the severity of cognitive dysfunction according to the MoCA (R= – 0.28), while in the hospital control group – between the proxy QoL rating and the severity of depressive manifestations (R= – 0.33). The first group of the patients was characterized by a mixed type of attitude to the disease and intrapsychic maladaptation (the neurasthenic type ranked first at 16.03±8.29 / 9.34±5.03 points), while the second group had a diffuse type of attitude to the disease and interpsychic maladaptation (the sensitive type ranked first at 10.31±5.71 / 14.90±7.62 points by the TATD scale among the elderly patients with MVD who have / have not undergone NCVI; p<0.05). The revealed patterns can contribute to the optimization of personalized models of medical and psychological rehabilitation of elderly patients with MVD living in closed-type care facilities.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.003

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.020
GPT teacher head0.272
Teacher spread0.252 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2023
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueVestnik nevrologii psihiatrii i nejrohirurgii (Bulletin of Neurology Psychiatry and Neurosurgery)Same topicLong-Term Effects of COVID-19French-language works237,207