Automated Lane-Level Road Geometry Estimation Using Microscopic Trajectory Data
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Vehicle trajectory data is in high demand for transportation research due to its rich detail. Lane information is an important aspect of trajectory data, which is typically obtained using sensors such as cameras or LiDAR, which are able to extract road lane features. However, some sensors for trajectory tracking (e.g., MMW radar sensors) are unable to provide lane information. Vehicle detection and trajectory tracking systems based on these sensing technologies can integrate with lane information through manual calibration during initial installation, but this process is labor-intensive and requires frequent recalibration as the sensors gradually become deviated by wind and vibration. This has posed a challenge for trajectory tracking, particularly for real-time applications. To address this challenge, this paper proposes a method for estimating lane-level road geometrics using microscopic trajectory data. The method involves segmenting the trajectory points using direction vectors and clustering them and fitting a series of cluster center points. The mean error (ME) of the distance between the estimated result and the ground truth reference is used to measure the accuracy of the lane-level road geometrics estimation in different conditions. Results show that when the average trajectory data includes at least approximately 30 points per meter in each segment, the ME is always less than 0.1 m. The method has also been tested on MMW wave radar data and found to be effective. This demonstrates the feasibility of our approach for dynamic calibration of road alignment in vehicle trajectory tracking systems.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".