MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W4389584866 · doi:10.17118/11143/20707

Neural control of the trunk during back extension and rotation inadolescents with and without idiopathic scoliosis : preliminaryresults

2023· article· en· W4389584866 on OpenAlexaff
Jean-Philippe Cyr, Sahian Alicia Maldonado Numata, Amirreza Kebritchi, Patricia Larouche, Pierre Mercier, Jean‐Sébastien Blouin, Martin Simoneau

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicScoliosis diagnosis and treatment
Canadian institutionsCentre hospitalier de l'Université LavalUniversity of British ColumbiaLa Cité MédicaleUniversité LavalCentre for Interdisciplinary Research in Rehabilitation
Fundersnot available
KeywordsScoliosisTrunkIdiopathic scoliosisRotation (mathematics)Extension (predicate logic)Physical medicine and rehabilitationControl (management)Computer scienceArtificial intelligenceMedicineSurgeryBiology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Scoliosis is a three-dimensional deformation of the spine consisting of lateral deviation and rotation of the vertebrae. It often occurs and develops in adolescence, which can have psychological and physiological consequences, or require spinal instrumentation surgery. The etiology of adolescent idiopathic scoliosis (AIS) is poorly known, but is recognized as multifactorial, involving sensory and motor alterations. We studied the neuromuscular control and symmetry of the back muscles in adolescents with or without AIS during the production of forces to perform an extension or a rotation of the trunk. Leaning against a structure comprising a cushion, a waist belt and a force transducer, participants performed a trunk extension to control the amplitude and direction of an arrow appearing on a screen monitor at ~1.5m in front of them. During data collection, the participants performed a trunk extension to reach and stay within targets representing 15% of the force produced during maximal voluntary contractions. We estimated and compared coherence and phase measurements between electromyographic signals from the longissimus muscles from the lumbar and thoracic regions (intermuscular, right versus left) and within each muscle (intramuscular, thoracolumbar). These measurements are indicators of motor neurons synchrony, providing information on the functioning of the sensorimotor loop on both sides and at different levels of the spine. We present the preliminary results of this study (SIA group, n = 17 F, 5 M; group without SIA: n = 3 F, 3 M). We observed that adolescents with AIS show decreased and asymmetric coupling in the alpha and beta frequency bands, as well as more variable phase in the alpha frequency bands compared to age and sex-matched adolescents without AIS. The alpha and beta intermuscular coherences reflect spinal and cortical mechanisms, respectively. Our findings, although preliminary, may reveal impaired neural control of axial muscles related to AIS. Monitoring the evolution of AIS in the months following our measurements will reveal whether the observed alterations represent a marker of the risk of the progression of the spine deformation.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.003
Threshold uncertainty score0.012

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.017
GPT teacher head0.256
Teacher spread0.239 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2023
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicScoliosis diagnosis and treatment→French-language works237,207→