MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4389584867 · doi:10.17118/11143/21031

Time-invariant hp-variational physics informed neural network to solvethe pipe conveying fluid equation

2023· article· en· W4389584867 on OpenAlexaff
Mohammed Abda, Frédérick P. Gosselin

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicVibration and Dynamic Analysis
Canadian institutionsPolytechnique Montréal
Fundersnot available
KeywordsInvariant (physics)Artificial neural networkApplied mathematicsFluid dynamicsComputer scienceLuke's variational principlePhysicsClassical mechanicsMathematical physicsMathematicsArtificial intelligenceMechanicsHamilton's principleEquations of motion

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract: Physics-informed neural networks (PINN) are machine-learning methods that leverage the physics expressed in the partial differential equations (PDE) to extract information from high-dimensional data generated through experiments. Petrov-Galerkin hp-variational physics-informed neural networks (hp-VPINN) formulate the solution based on domain decomposition and projection onto space of high-order polynomials allowing the network to construct both global and local approximations. The integrand in the variational form lowers the order of the differential operators of the PDE which are incorporated into the loss function of the network, hence reducing the training cost of the network. However, such a method has only been tested on simple transient and academic problems, and in the current literature, all solutions to time-dependent problems still depend on specific initial conditions. Hence, the network must be re-trained for different initial conditions every time, which is expensive and not practical for the same system. In the present work, we propose a time-invariant hp-VPINN to solve the linear equation for small lateral displacements of the pipe conveying fluid (PCF). In the linear regime, the fluid flow inside the pipe induces added damping and stabilizes the system. The added damping changes as the flow speed increases until it becomes negative, and the system becomes unstable by flutter for a cantilevered PCF. In the proposed work, the temporal terms will be discretized using Euler backward method where the network will be trained using random previous time steps to predict the next time step. Once training is complete, the network will be used as a time integrator where it will be given a random initial time step, then it will use step output as an input for the next time step eliminating the dependency on the time history of the solution. We will test the predictability of our trained model by comparing the network outputs with experimental data for different flow speeds and initial conditions. We anticipate that our model will perform as a general solver for the linear PCF equation for any flow speed and initial conditions. For future work, the model will be further developed to solve the nonlinear PCF equations in two and three dimensions where the system undergoes through two-and three-dimensional limit cycles and chaotic motion. Finally, we plan to create a real-time model that gives real-time predictions without depending on the long-term history of the system.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.980
Threshold uncertainty score0.999

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.002

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.020
GPT teacher head0.230
Teacher spread0.211 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2023
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicVibration and Dynamic AnalysisFrench-language works237,207