MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4389585006 · doi:10.17118/11143/20922

Geometric modelling of HV cable conductor structure

2023· article· en· W4389585006 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicPower Line Inspection Robots
Canadian institutionsÉcole de Technologie Supérieure
Fundersnot available
KeywordsConductorComputer scienceElectrical conductorElectrical engineeringEngineeringMaterials scienceComposite material

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract: The automatization and electrification of many industrial processes and machines require the usage of high voltage (HV) electrical cables with increased mechanical and electrical performances. To meet these new requirements, HV cables with thousands of stranded conductive wires are widely used for their high mechanical compliance and reduced electrical resistance. Integrated within various systems, these cables are subjected to various static and dynamic mechanical loads. These loads can lead to wire damage and breakage and, thus, reduced performance and lifespan. To better interpret and predict the effect of these loading conditions, characterizing individual wire stresses and load distributions is essential. However, due to HV cable complex internal structure, defining a detailed geometrical configuration including all wire interactions is a challenging task limiting the possibilities to undertake in-depth analysis fully considering cable kinematics.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.212
Threshold uncertainty score0.777

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.033
GPT teacher head0.219
Teacher spread0.186 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2023
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicPower Line Inspection RobotsFrench-language works237,207