Hollow Filaments from Coaxial Dry–Jet Wet Spinning of a Cellulose Solution in an Ionic Liquid: Wet-Strength and Water Interactions
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Hollow tubing and tubular filaments are highly relevant to membrane technologies, vascular tissue engineering, and others. In this context, we introduce hollow filaments (HF) produced through coaxial dry-jet wet spinning of cellulose dissolved in an ionic liquid ([emim][OAc]). The HF, developed upon regeneration in water (23 °C), displays superior mechanical performance (168 MPa stiffness and 60% stretchability) compared to biobased counterparts, such as those based on collagen. The results are rationalized by the effects of crystallinity, polymer orientation, and other factors associated with rheology, thermal stability, and dynamic vapor sorption. The tensile strength and strain of the HF (dry and wet) are enhanced by drying and wetting cycles (water vapor sorption and desorption experiments). Overall, we unveil the role of water molecules in the wet performance of HF produced by cellulose regeneration from [emim][OAc], which offers a basis for selecting suitable applications.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".