MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4389608764 · doi:10.7202/1107670ar

Monnaie d’échange. Dot et corps féminin dans La curée d’Émile Zola

2023· article· fr· W4389608764 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Véronique Cnockaert

Bibliographic record

VenueÉtudes françaises · 2023
Typearticle
Languagefr
FieldArts and Humanities
TopicHistorical Studies and Socio-cultural Analysis
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHumanitiesArt

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

L’économie évacue souvent de son domaine la portée des sentiments, des émotions, et de la dépendance au sein des relations humaines. Toutefois, dans La curée de Zola, les spéculations d’Aristide Saccard font bon usage des sentiments de sa femme Renée pour son beau-fils, Maxime Saccard. Au coeur de ce roman, flux monétaire et circulation matrimoniale soulignent à quel point le capitalisme en marche fait peu de cas des prohibitions symboliques. En laissant sa femme jouir du présent et de son amour incestueux, Aristide s’octroie le pouvoir de jouir de l’avenir en augmentant son capital. La curée nous offre à lire une spéculation toute privée, à l’intérieur de laquelle la représentation des femmes est associée à la monnaie, en tant qu’elles sont objet d’échange doté d’une valeur économique. Cet article saisit, dans ce roman, les modalités d’une économie de la jouissance qui s’articule autour d’un système de parenté et de légalité dévoyé qui ne craint pas d’absorber tout type d’échange (corps, biens inaliénables, désir interdit), ainsi que les modalités d’une mobilité des femmes qui ne se réduit pas à la circulation mondaine.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.011
Threshold uncertainty score0.030

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0040.009
Scholarly communication0.0040.002
Open science0.0000.002
Research integrity0.0010.004
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0080.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.032
GPT teacher head0.247
Teacher spread0.214 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2023
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueÉtudes françaisesSame topicHistorical Studies and Socio-cultural AnalysisFrench-language works237,207