FAMILY UPBRINGING FEATURES IN THE PEASANT FAMILY OF THE CENTRAL UKRAINIAN REGION OF THE 19TH – FIRST QUARTER OF THE 20TH CENTURY
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Features of family upbringing in the Ukrainian peasant family of the 19th – first quarter of the 20th century taking into account a regional aspect have been revealed in the article. The authors consider the Center of Ukraine as a multicultural region inhabited by representatives of many countries of the world. The focus of publication is on the peasant family, since the Ukrainian society of the 19th – first quarter of the 20th century belonged to the traditional, characterized by the dominance of agriculture. The feature of such a society – the process of its formation took place in the interaction of "pagan" consciousness with Christianity, as a result of which various syncretic forms emerged, which were the ideological principles of collective life, has been singled out. The leading areas of children upbringing: labor, physical and moral, which were determined by traditional norms of life, behavior, lifestyle, and religious beliefs have been considered in the article. Key words: family upbringing, Ukrainian peasant family, Central Ukrainian region, directions of upbringing, traditional society, traditional norms of everyday life.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.003 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".