MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4389616884 · doi:10.5530/ptb.2023.9.3

Drug Review: Tirzepatide

2023· article· en· W4389616884 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Juman Alsaab

Bibliographic record

VenuePharmacology Toxicology and Biomedical Reports · 2023
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicDiabetes Treatment and Management
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsChristian ministryDrugMedicinePostprandialType 2 Diabetes MellitusGlucagon-like peptide-1Internal medicineEndocrinologyDiabetes mellitusPharmacologyType 2 diabetesPolitical science

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

PTB Reports,2023,9,1,20-22.DOI:10.5530/PTB.2023.9.3Published:November 2023Type:Drug ReviewAuthors:Juman Alsaab Author(s) affiliations:Juman Alsaab, Pharm D,Ministry of Health, Riyadh, SAUDI ARABIA. Abstract:Registrations: Tirzepatide has been registered in the following countries United States of America (USA), United Kingdom (U.K.), Canada, Saudi Arabia (S.A.). Trade name (USA): MOUNJARO Registration number (S.A.); Not Available. Insurance Drug Formulary (S.A.); Not covered (28.1.2023). General Information: Registered Company: Lilly USA. Regulatory Status: R.X. Mechanism of Action: Tirzepatide is a Glucose-dependent Insulinotropic Polypeptide (GIP) receptor and Glucagon-Like Peptide-1 (GLP-1) receptor agonist. It is a 39-amino acid-modified peptide containing a C20 fatty diacid component that facilitates albumin binding and increases the halflife. Tirzepatide preferentially binds to and activates GIP and GLP- 1 receptors, hence targeting endogenous GIP and GLP. Tirzepatide increases the first and second phases of insulin secretion and decreases glucagon levels in a glucose-dependent manner. Tirzepatide reduces fasting and postprandial glucose levels, food consumption, and body weight in people with type 2 diabetes. Indication: Type 2 diabetes mellitus. View:PDF (230.22 KB) PDF PDF Images Drug Review: Tirzepatide

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.047
Threshold uncertainty score0.999

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.019
GPT teacher head0.343
Teacher spread0.324 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2023
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuePharmacology Toxicology and Biomedical ReportsSame topicDiabetes Treatment and ManagementFrench-language works237,207