MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W4389620170 · doi:10.1093/mnras/stad3792

[C <scp>ii</scp>] 158 μm emission as an indicator of galaxy star formation rate

2023· article· en· W4389620170 on OpenAlexafffund
Lichen Liang, Robert Feldmann, Norman Murray, Desika Narayanan, Christopher C. Hayward, Daniel Anglés‐Alcázar, Luigi Bassini, Alexander J. Richings, Claude‐André Faucher‐Giguère, Dongwoo T. Chung, Jennifer Y H Chan, D. Tolgay, Onur Çatmabacak, Dušan Kereš, Philip F. Hopkins

Bibliographic record

VenueMonthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society · 2023
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicAstrophysics and Star Formation Studies
Canadian institutionsCanadian Institute for Theoretical AstrophysicsUniversity of Toronto
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaUniversität ZürichSchweizerischer Nationalfonds zur Förderung der Wissenschaftlichen ForschungSpace Telescope Science InstituteInnovation, Science and Economic Development CanadaCanadian Institute for Theoretical AstrophysicsSimons FoundationNational Aeronautics and Space AdministrationUniversity of TorontoResearch Corporation for Science AdvancementNational Science Foundation
KeywordsPhysicsAstrophysicsGalaxyStar formationLuminous infrared galaxyLuminosityRedshiftStellar massMetallicity

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

ABSTRACT Observations of local star-forming galaxies (SFGs) show a tight correlation between their singly ionized carbon line luminosity ($L_{\rm [C\, {\small II}]}$) and star formation rate (SFR), suggesting that $L_{\rm [C\, {\small II}]}$ may be a useful SFR tracer for galaxies. Some other galaxy populations, however, are found to have lower $L_{\rm [C\, {\small II}]}{}/{}\rm SFR$ than local SFGs, including the infrared (IR)-luminous, starburst galaxies at low and high redshifts as well as some moderately SFGs at the epoch of re-ionization (EoR). The origins of this ‘$\rm [C\, {\small II}]$ deficit’ is unclear. In this work, we study the $L_{\rm [C\, {\small II}]}$–SFR relation of galaxies using a sample of z = 0–8 galaxies with $M_*\approx 10^7-5\times 10^{11}\, \mathrm{M}_\odot$ extracted from cosmological volume and zoom-in simulations from the Feedback in Realistic Environments (fire) project. We find a simple analytic expression for $L_{\rm [C\, {\small II}]}$/SFR of galaxies in terms of the following parameters: mass fraction of $\rm [C\, {\small II}]$-emitting gas ($f_{\rm [C\, {\small II}]}$), gas metallicity (Zgas), gas density (ngas), and gas depletion time ($t_{\rm dep}{}={}M_{\rm gas}{}/{}\rm SFR$). We find two distinct physical regimes: $\rm H_2$-rich galaxies, where tdep is the main driver of the $\rm [C\, {\small II}]$ deficit and $\rm H_2$-poor galaxies where Zgas is the main driver. The observed $\rm [C\, {\small II}]$ deficit of IR-luminous galaxies and early EoR galaxies, corresponding to the two different regimes, is due to short gas depletion time and low gas metallicity, respectively. Our result indicates that the $\rm [C\, {\small II}]$ deficit is a common phenomenon of galaxies, and caution needs to be taken when applying a constant $L_{\rm [C\, {\small II}]}$-to-SFR conversion factor derived from local SFGs to estimate cosmic SFR density at high redshifts and interpret data from upcoming $\rm [C\, {\small II}]$ line intensity mapping experiments.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.010
Threshold uncertainty score0.020

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.009
GPT teacher head0.224
Teacher spread0.215 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations23
Published2023
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueMonthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society→Same topicAstrophysics and Star Formation Studies→French-language works237,207→