MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4389620909 · doi:10.1080/10407782.2023.2290086

Exploration of nonlinear radiative heat energy on Buongiorno modeled nano liquid toward an inclined porous plate with heat source and variable chemical reaction

2023· article· en· W4389620909 on OpenAlexaff
Yijie Li, MD. Shamshuddin, Govind R. Rajput, Abuzar Ghaffari, Taseer Muhammad

Bibliographic record

VenueNumerical Heat Transfer Part A Applications · 2023
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicNanofluid Flow and Heat Transfer
Canadian institutionsArtificial Intelligence in Medicine (Canada)
FundersKing Khalid University
KeywordsThermophoresisNanofluidThermal radiationMechanicsDimensionless quantityRadiative transferMaterials scienceHeat generationPorous mediumPartial differential equationBoundary layerNonlinear systemThermodynamicsHeat transferPorosityPhysicsOpticsComposite material

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Nanofluids are fluid suspensions of nanoparticles that exhibit a considerable improvement in their characteristics at low nanoparticle concentrations. Numerous research on nanofluids focuses on interpreting their behavior in order to use them in applications where improving straight heat transmission is crucial, such as in various industrial settings, nuclear reactors, transportation, biology, food, and electronics. Thus, this study examines the implementation of a novel numerical technique, namely the shooting method for nonlinear radiative heat energy study on Buongiorno modeled nano liquid confined by an inclined porous plate. The Brownian and thermophoresis diffusions impacts are also accounted. The transmission of thermal and solutal energy is regulated by the considerable influence of nonlinear thermal radiation, heat source, and variable chemical reactions. The dimensional modeled partial differential equations (PDEs), by using precise similarity functions, have been mutated into ordinary differential equations (ODEs). The outcomes for the flow field, thermal, and solutal outlines are captured graphically. The values of the dimensionless parameters are chosen from the literature in such a way that they have significantly affected the dimensionless boundary layer (BL) profiles. Also, the non-dimensional profiles of velocity, temperature, and concentration observe two different trends (increasing and decreasing) for diverse values of the dimensionless parameters.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.003
Threshold uncertainty score0.007

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.021
GPT teacher head0.231
Teacher spread0.211 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations16
Published2023
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueNumerical Heat Transfer Part A ApplicationsSame topicNanofluid Flow and Heat TransferFrench-language works237,207