MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4389633326 · doi:10.11159/ijepr.2023.004

Treatment of Factory Effluent Using a Combined Coagulation and Filtration System: Empirical Insights from Uganda

2023· article· en· W4389633326 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Gloria Linda Ndagire, Roice Bwambale Kalengyo

Bibliographic record

VenueInternational Journal of Environmental Pollution and Remediation · 2023
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicEnvironmental Chemistry and Analysis
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsEffluentFactory (object-oriented programming)CoagulationFiltration (mathematics)Pulp and paper industryEnvironmental scienceProcess engineeringMedicineComputer scienceInternal medicineEnvironmental engineeringEngineeringMathematicsStatistics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The treatment of wastewater from various sources, such as agricultural and industrial facilities, poses significant challenges in improving public health and well-being, especially in developing countries like Uganda.This study aimed to address this issue by investigating the quality and quantity of wastewater from a specific factory in Uganda and designing a treatment system capable of meeting discharge standards.The research involved sampling the wastewater at the factory and conducting both on-site and laboratory tests to assess its characteristics.The proposed treatment system consists of a mixing unit, sedimentation tank, and filtration unit.Coagulation/flocculation with alum was used in the mixing unit, followed by sedimentation to facilitate the settling of solids.In the filtration unit, commercial granular activated carbon was employed to adsorb contaminants, while sand was placed below it to capture remaining suspended solids after sedimentation.The results indicate that the combination of coagulation/flocculation and filtration processes effectively treats paint wastewater.The study examined the system's performance at various effluent qualities by varying the initial contaminant concentrations.For initial contaminant concentrations of Chemical Oxygen Demand (COD) at 6,200 mg/L, Biological Oxygen Demand (BOD) at 489 mg/L, color at 39,000 mg/L, Total Phosphorus at 2,453 mg/L, and Total Nitrogen (TN) at 1,800 mg/L, the system achieved impressive removal efficiencies: 98.6% for COD, 91.4% for BOD, 99.6% for color, 99.2% for TN, and 99.8% for total phosphorus.In summary, this research paper presents a study on the treatment of paint wastewater from a factory in Uganda.The proposed treatment system, using coagulation/flocculation and filtration, demonstrates high removal efficiencies for various contaminants, making it a promising solution for addressing wastewater treatment challenges in the region.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.008
Threshold uncertainty score0.016

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.017
GPT teacher head0.255
Teacher spread0.238 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2023
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueInternational Journal of Environmental Pollution and RemediationSame topicEnvironmental Chemistry and AnalysisFrench-language works237,207