MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4389662006 · doi:10.2118/218386-pa

A Physics-Informed Spatial-Temporal Neural Network for Reservoir Simulation and Uncertainty Quantification

2023· article· en· W4389662006 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueSPE Journal · 2023
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicModel Reduction and Neural Networks
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Calgary
Fundersnot available
KeywordsConvolutional neural networkRobustness (evolution)Computer scienceGeneralizationArtificial intelligenceDeep learningUncertainty quantificationMachine learningArtificial neural networkReservoir computingRecurrent neural networkMathematics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Summary Surrogate models play a vital role in reducing computational complexity and time burden for reservoir simulations. However, traditional surrogate models suffer from limitations in autonomous temporal information learning and restrictions in generalization potential, which is due to a lack of integration with physical knowledge. In response to these challenges, a physics-informed spatial-temporal neural network (PI-STNN) is proposed in this work, which incorporates flow theory into the loss function and uniquely integrates a deep convolutional encoder-decoder (DCED) with a convolutional long short-term memory (ConvLSTM) network. To demonstrate the robustness and generalization capabilities of the PI-STNN model, its performance was compared against both a purely data-driven model with the same neural network architecture and the renowned Fourier neural operator (FNO) in a comprehensive analysis. Besides, by adopting a transfer learning strategy, the trained PI-STNN model was adapted to the fractured flow fields to investigate the impact of natural fractures on its prediction accuracy. The results indicate that the PI-STNN not only excels in comparison with the purely data-driven model but also demonstrates a competitive edge over the FNO in reservoir simulation. Especially in strongly heterogeneous flow fields with fractures, the PI-STNN can still maintain high prediction accuracy. Building on this prediction accuracy, the PI-STNN model further offers a distinct advantage in efficiently performing uncertainty quantification, enabling rapid and comprehensive analysis of investment decisions in oil and gas development.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.253
Threshold uncertainty score0.374

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.066
GPT teacher head0.338
Teacher spread0.273 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it