Theoretical Performance Evaluation of Battery Equivalent Circuit Model Parameter Estimators
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Equivalent circuit model (ECM) based approaches are widely used by Li-ion battery management systems. In the ECM approach, the voltage drop within a battery is modelled using resistive and capacitive electrical components. Numerous approaches were reported to estimate the parameters of ECM based on the voltage and current measurements from the battery. Battery ECM parameter estimation is done based on both voltage and current measurements. The measurement noise in these applications results in a doubly noisy observation model and makes theoretical analysis challenging. In this paper, theoretical performance bounds are derived for ECM parameter estimation in batteries where the effect of both voltage and current measurement noises are objectively analyzed. The performance bound is derived in the form of Cramer-Rao lower bound (CRLB) by considering the doubly noisy observation model that represent ECM parameter estimation in batteries. It is shown that traditional least square estimation approach becomes biased and inefficient at low signal to noise ratio (SNR) levels. A new approach, based on the total least squares (TLS) method, is developed for low SNR conditions. It is shown through simulation experiments that the TLS approach can be efficient for ECM parameter estimation. The proposed approach is validated through data collected from cylindrical Li-ion battery cells.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".