MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4389664952 · doi:10.1109/access.2023.3342190

Multi-Microservice Migration Modeling, Comparison, and Potential in 5G/6G Mobile Edge Computing: A Non-Average Parameter Values Approach

2023· article· en· W4389664952 on OpenAlexafffund
Arshin Rezazadeh, Hanan Lutfiyya

Bibliographic record

VenueIEEE Access · 2023
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicIoT and Edge/Fog Computing
Canadian institutionsWestern University
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
KeywordsComputer scienceCloud computingEdge computingDistributed computingEnhanced Data Rates for GSM EvolutionComputer networkEdge deviceVirtualizationOverhead (engineering)Mobile edge computingMobile deviceDowntimeMobile computingLatency (audio)ServerTelecommunicationsOperating system

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Cloud, fog, and edge computing integration with future mobile Internet-of-Things (IoT) devices and related applications in 5G/6G networks will become more practical in the coming years. Containers became the de facto virtualization technique that replaced Virtual Memory (VM). Mobile IoT applications, e.g., intelligent transportation and augmented reality, incorporating fog-edge, have increased the demand for a millisecond-scale response and processing time. Edge Computing reduces remote network traffic and latency. These services must run on edge nodes that are physically close to devices. However, classical migration techniques may not meet the requirements of future mission-critical IoT applications. IoT mobile devices have limited resources for running multiple services, and client-server latency worsens when fog-edge services must migrate to maintain proximity in light of device mobility. This study analyzes the performance of the MiGrror migration method and the pre-copy live migration method when the migration of heterogeneous multiple VMs/containers is considered. This paper presents mathematical models for the stated methods and provides migration guidelines and comparisons for services to be implemented as multiple containers, as in microservice-based environments. Experiments demonstrate that MiGrror outperforms the pre-copy technique and, unlike conventional live migrations, can maintain less than 10 milliseconds of downtime and reduce migration time with a minimal bandwidth overhead. The results show that MiGrror can improve service continuity and availability for users. Most significant is that the model can use average and non-average values for different parameters during migration to achieve improved and more accurate results, while other research typically only uses average values. This paper shows that using only average parameter values in migration can lead to inaccurate results.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.010
Threshold uncertainty score0.020

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.002
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.050
GPT teacher head0.325
Teacher spread0.276 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations7
Published2023
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueIEEE AccessSame topicIoT and Edge/Fog ComputingFrench-language works237,207