MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Design of a 100 Gb/s Ethernet Interface for a Silicon Photonics-based Data Acquisition System for Particle Physics Experiments

2023· article· en· W4389667803 on OpenAlexaff
G. Lessard, P. Arsenault, P. Martel-Dion, Sean Prentice, T. Rossignol, F. Retière, Serge A. Charlebois, J.‐F. Pratte

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicSemiconductor Lasers and Optical Devices
Canadian institutionsTRIUMFInstitut interdisciplinaire d'innovation technologique
Fundersnot available
KeywordsData acquisitionComputer hardwareEthernetInterface (matter)Embedded systemComputer scienceGigabit EthernetField-programmable gate arrayOperating system

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Particle physics experiments, like nEXO and ARGO, require a large-scale data acquisition system capable of supporting high data rates. One can expect a total data rate of approximately 400 Gb/s for nEXO, whereas ARGO estimates are on a scale of Pb/s. To support those experiments, which require a low-power and high-bandwidth communication (≈1 Gb/s per link), a modular Silicon-Photonics (SiP) communication module is in development to connect the front-end electronics to the data acquisition system (DAQ). This research focuses on the interface between more than 100 optical transceivers and the DAQ. To eliminate the need for custom hardware in the servers of the DAQ, the system is compatible with a standard Ethernet network. Targetting an Ethernet interface allows the use of commodity off-the-shelf equipment to connect custom electronics to the DAQ and simplifies integration, deployment, and maintenance. This system is composed of a Zynq system-on-chip (SoC), where the FPGA receives data from a set of transceivers and wraps the frame received in UDP datagrams sent to the DAQ; the processor handles various configurations and commands. To match the requirements on data rates and modularity, this study proposes a proof of concept demonstrating a 100 Gb/s link using a FPGA to transfer the data from the custom SiP transceivers to a server running DAQ software, implemented using the MIDAS framework. Following this work, the implemented Ethernet link will constitute a system ready to integrate with the SiP communication module. This integration will provide a platform to deploy large-scale and high data-rate DAQs for the targeted experiments, namely nEXO and ARGO.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.005
Threshold uncertainty score0.017

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0020.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0050.002

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.113
GPT teacher head0.326
Teacher spread0.212 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2023
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicSemiconductor Lasers and Optical DevicesFrench-language works237,207