Memory from Below: Emma Goldman, Counter-Monuments, and the Politics of Public Memory
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract: Two public memorials dedicated to Emma Goldman (1869–1940), a radical early feminist, are examined within a broader discussion about the preservation of feminist collective memory. Goldman was a prominent anarchist and advocate for women’s rights, labour rights, and freedom of speech, who was in conversation with the American women’s suffrage movement throughout her life—and was one of the rare critical voices pushing the movement toward ever more progressive positions from the left. Contrasting traditional forms of commemoration with the “counter-monuments” designed by artists and spontaneously erected by her admirers allows us to explore the effects of such memorials on the forms public memory can take and the stakes involved in those formal choices. Abstract: Deux lieux de commémoration publics dédiés à Emma Goldman (1869-1940), une féministe radicale et pionnière, sont examinés dans le cadre d’une discussion plus large sur la préservation de la mémoire collective féministe. Goldman était une anarchiste de renom qui défendait les droits des femmes, les droits des travailleurs et la liberté d’expression. Tout au long de sa vie, elle s’est entretenue avec le mouvement américain pour le droit de vote des femmes —et a été l’une des rares voix critiques à pousser le mouvement vers des positions toujours plus progressistes émanant de la gauche. La mise en contraste des formes traditionnelles de commémoration et des « contre-monuments » conçus par des artistes et érigés spontanément par ses admirateurs nous permet d’explorer les effets de ces lieux commémoratifs sur les formes que peut prendre la mémoire publique et sur les enjeux liés à ces choix formels.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.002 | 0.006 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it