The Position of Foreign Investment in the Indonesian Economic System Based on Pancasila and the 1945 Constitution of the Republic of Indonesia
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Objective: This research aims to find arguments (theories) to ensure that foreign direct investment does not conflict with but is in accordance with the values of Pancasila and the provisions of the 1945 Constitution of the Republic of Indonesia. Conceptual foundation: Each country in the world cannot isolate itself but must establish relationships and work together to achieve the good of those countries. Robert Jackson and Georg Sorensen said that each other's countries are independent and have sovereignty. But they are not estranged from each other. They are adjacent to and influence each other and side by side and opposite each other. Therefore, complete separation of one country from another is not an option. A country that is isolated and disconnected from other countries will usually suffer. Method: This research is normative juridical using conceptual, statutory, and historical approaches. The legal materials used are primary legal materials and secondary legal materials, which are collected systematically according to the issues of concern in this research and the collection technique uses literature study, then the problems are analyzed qualitatively. Result and conclusion: Foreign direct investment has a position as part and complement of the Indonesian economic system because its existence is in accordance with the values contained in Pancasila and the 1945 Constitution of the Republic of Indonesia. Contribution: The results of this research convince and invite the Indonesian people that the presence of foreign direct investment in the Indonesian economic system no longer needs to be debated, but accept foreign direct investment as a complement and encourage growth and realize the welfare of the Indonesian people in accordance with the Preamble to the Constitution of the Republic of Indonesia.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.004 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".