Hubungan antara fungsi kognitif dengan penyesuaian perguruan pinggi pada mahasiswa korban kekerasan seksual
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Kekerasan seksual berdampak banyak pada aspek-aspek kehidupan korbannya. kekerasan seksual berdampak pada penurunan fungsi kognitif yang selanjutnya berdampak pada kemampuan akademis. Korban kekerasan seksual pun memperlihatkan masalah perilaku yang bentuknya internalisasi (menarik diri) dan eksternalisasi (memberontak atau mengganggu orang lain), hal ini memungkinkan para korban mengalami hambatan dalam menyesuaikan diri di perguruan tinggi. Penelitian ini bertujuan meneliti mengenai korelasi antara fungsi kognitif dengan penyesuaian perguruan tinggi pada mahasiswa korban kekerasan seksual. Partisipan berjumlah 60 orang mahasiswa dengan usia rata-rata 21,6 tahun, yang terdiri dari perempuan sebanyak 58,33%, serta berdomisili di kota Bandung. Alat ukur menggunakan kuesioner adjustment to college (SACQ), dan tes fungsi kognitif menggunakan The Indonesian Version of Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA-Ina). Hasil penelitian menunjukkan terdapat korelasi positif yang signifikan antara fungsi kognitif dengan penyesuaian perguruan tinggi pada mahasiswa korban kekerasan seksual. Penelitian ini melengkapi referensi mengenai dampak kekerasan seksual dalam seting pendidikan di perguruan tinggi, serta diharapkan dapat menjadi bahan rujukan dalam menyusun intervensi guna membantu para korban kekerasan seksual menyelesaikan pendidikannya.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.018 | 0.004 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".