MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4389684023 · doi:10.9734/jamcs/2023/v38i111848

Orthonormal Bases on \(\mathit{L}^2\)(\(\mathbb{R}\)\(^+\))

2023· article· en· W4389684023 on OpenAlexaff
Goce Chadzitaskos, M. Havlı́ček, J. Patera

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Advances in Mathematics and Computer Science · 2023
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicImage and Signal Denoising Methods
Canadian institutionsUniversité de Montréal
Fundersnot available
KeywordsOrthonormal basisEigenvalues and eigenvectorsSpace (punctuation)CombinatoricsDifferential equationPhysicsHarmonic oscillatorMathematicsMathematical physicsMathematical analysisQuantum mechanics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In addition to orthogonal polynomials, orthogonal functions also play an important role. Their applications are, among others, in the fields of signal and data analysis, dynamic modeling. They are related to the solution of differential equations. In this paper we derive the explicit form of one parameter family of orthonormal bases on space \(\mathit{L}^2\)(\(\mathbb{R}\)\(^+\)). The bases are formed by eigenvectors of the self-adjoint extension \(\mathit{H}_\xi\), parametrized by \(\xi\) \(\in\) \(\small\langle\)0,\(\pi\)), of differential expression \(\mathit{H} = -{ \mathit{d}^2 \over \mathit{d}^{x2}} +{ \mathit{x}^2 \over 4} \) together with the spectrum \(\sigma\)(\(\mathit{H}_\xi\)) on the space \(\mathit{L}^2\)(\(\mathbb{R}^+\)). For each \(\xi\) the set of eigenvectors form an orthonormal basis of \(\mathit{L}^2\)(\(\mathbb{R}\)\(^+\)). From the physical point of view, it is a solution of the Schrodinger equation of a harmonic oscillator on a semi-straight line. To correlate platelet count, splenic index (SI), platelet count/spleen diameter ratio and portal-systemic venous collaterals with the presence of esophageal varices in advanced liver disease to validate other screening parameters.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.003
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: Methods
Teacher disagreement score0.826
Threshold uncertainty score0.434

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0030.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.002
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.002
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.021
GPT teacher head0.313
Teacher spread0.292 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreMethods

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2023
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Advances in Mathematics and Computer ScienceSame topicImage and Signal Denoising MethodsFrench-language works237,207