MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4389687275 · doi:10.3847/2041-8213/ad0fdd

Ejecta Evolution Following a Planned Impact into an Asteroid: The First Five Weeks

2023· article· en· W4389687275 on OpenAlexaff
Theodore Kareta, Cristina A. Thomas, Jian‐Yang Li, Matthew M. Knight, Nicholas Moskovitz, Agata Rożek, Michele T. Bannister, Simone Ieva, C. Snodgrass, Petr Pravec, E. V. Ryan, W. H. Ryan, Eugene G. Fahnestock, A. S. Rivkin, N. L. Chabot, A. Fitzsimmons, D. J. Osip, Tim Lister, Gal Sarid, Masatoshi Hirabayashi, T. L. Farnham, G. Tancredi, Patrick Michel, R. J. Wainscoat, Rob Weryk, Bonnie Burrati, J. Pittichová, Ryan Ridden-Harper, Nicole J. Tan, P. J. Tristram, Tyler F. M. Brown, M. Bonavita, M. Burgdorf, Elahe Khalouei, Penelope Longa, M. Rabus, Sedighe Sajadian, Uffe Graae Jørgensen, M. Dominik, J. B. Kikwaya, E. Mazzotta Epifani, E. Dotto, Prasanna Deshapriya, P. H. Hasselmann, M. Dall’Ora, Lyu Abe, T. Guillot, D. Mékarnia, A. Agabi, Philippe Bendjoya, Olga Suárez, A. H. M. J. Triaud, T Gasparetto, Maximillian N. Günther, Michael Kueppers, B. Merín, Joseph Chatelain, Edward Gomez, Helen Usher, Cai Stoddard-Jones, Matthew Bartnik, Michael Bellaver, Brenna Chetan, Emma Dugan, Tori Fallon, Jeremy Fedewa, Caitlyn Gerhard, Seth A. Jacobson, Shane Painter, D. Peterson, Joseph E. Rodriguez, Cody Smith, K. V. Sokolovsky, Hannah Sullivan, Kate Townley, Sarah Watson, Levi Webb, J. M. Trigo‐Rodríguez, Josep M. Llenas, Ignacio Pérez-García, A. J. Castro‐Tirado, Jean‐Baptiste Vincent, A. Migliorini, M. Lazzarin, Fiorangela La Forgia, Fabio Ferrari, Tom Polakis, B. A. Skiff

Bibliographic record

VenueThe Astrophysical Journal Letters · 2023
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicAstro and Planetary Science
Canadian institutionsWestern University
FundersScience and Technology Facilities CouncilAgencia Estatal de InvestigaciónNational Aeronautics and Space AdministrationCalifornia Institute of TechnologyMarshall Space Flight CenterCentre National d’Etudes SpatialesJet Propulsion Laboratory
KeywordsEjectaAsteroidAstrobiologyGeologyAstronomyPhysicsSupernova

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract The impact of the Double Asteroid Redirection Test spacecraft into Dimorphos, moon of the asteroid Didymos, changed Dimorphos’s orbit substantially, largely from the ejection of material. We present results from 12 Earth-based facilities involved in a world-wide campaign to monitor the brightness and morphology of the ejecta in the first 35 days after impact. After an initial brightening of ∼1.4 mag, we find consistent dimming rates of 0.11–0.12 mag day −1 in the first week, and 0.08–0.09 mag day −1 over the entire study period. The system returned to its pre-impact brightness 24.3–25.3 days after impact though the primary ejecta tail remained. The dimming paused briefly eight days after impact, near in time to the appearance of the second tail. This was likely due to a secondary release of material after re-impact of a boulder released in the initial impact, though movement of the primary ejecta through the aperture likely played a role.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.846
Threshold uncertainty score0.813

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.007
GPT teacher head0.233
Teacher spread0.225 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations17
Published2023
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueThe Astrophysical Journal LettersSame topicAstro and Planetary ScienceFrench-language works237,207