MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4389694024 · doi:10.1515/9780889776791-004

TERMINOLOGY

2019· book-chapter· en· W4389694024 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
James S. Frideres

Bibliographic record

VenueUniversity of Regina Press eBooks · 2019
Typebook-chapter
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicIndigenous Health, Education, and Rights
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsTerminologyComputer scienceLinguisticsPhilosophy

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Below are some basic terms necessary to understand any discussion of Indigenous people in Canada.Although formal and legal documents use the term "Aboriginal," in this book I use the term "Indigenous" in many circumstances because it is more acceptable to Indigenous people in Canada (Younging 2018). Aboriginal Peoples:The descendants of the original inhabitants of North America.The Canadian Constitution recognizes three groups of Aboriginal Peoples: Indians, Métis, and Inuit.These three distinct groups have unique heritages, languages, cultural practices, and spiritual beliefs.Aboriginal Rights: Rights that some Indigenous Peoples of Canada hold because of their ancestors' long-standing use and occupancy of the land.The rights of certain Indigenous Peoples to hunt, trap, and fish on ancestral lands are examples of Aboriginal Rights.These rights vary from group to group depending on the customs, practices, and traditions that have formed their distinctive cultures.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesScience and technology studies
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: Other
Teacher disagreement score0.994
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.030
GPT teacher head0.246
Teacher spread0.216 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2019
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueUniversity of Regina Press eBooksSame topicIndigenous Health, Education, and RightsFrench-language works237,207