MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4389694024 · doi:10.1515/9780889776791-004

TERMINOLOGY

2019· book-chapter· en· W4389694024 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
James S. Frideres

Bibliographic record

VenueUniversity of Regina Press eBooks · 2019
Typebook-chapter
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicIndigenous Health, Education, and Rights
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsTerminologyComputer scienceLinguisticsPhilosophy

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Below are some basic terms necessary to understand any discussion of Indigenous people in Canada.Although formal and legal documents use the term "Aboriginal," in this book I use the term "Indigenous" in many circumstances because it is more acceptable to Indigenous people in Canada (Younging 2018). Aboriginal Peoples:The descendants of the original inhabitants of North America.The Canadian Constitution recognizes three groups of Aboriginal Peoples: Indians, Métis, and Inuit.These three distinct groups have unique heritages, languages, cultural practices, and spiritual beliefs.Aboriginal Rights: Rights that some Indigenous Peoples of Canada hold because of their ancestors' long-standing use and occupancy of the land.The rights of certain Indigenous Peoples to hunt, trap, and fish on ancestral lands are examples of Aboriginal Rights.These rights vary from group to group depending on the customs, practices, and traditions that have formed their distinctive cultures.Aboriginal self-government: Governments designed, established, and administered by Indigenous Peoples.Aboriginal Title: A legal term that recognizes an Indigenous interest in the land.It is based upon the long-standing use and occupancy of the land by today's Indigenous Peoples as the descendants of the original inhabitants of Canada.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.005
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: Other
Teacher disagreement score0.911
Threshold uncertainty score0.931

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.005
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0060.012
Science and technology studies0.0110.005
Scholarly communication0.0110.005
Open science0.0050.004
Research integrity0.0020.004
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0890.048

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.030
GPT teacher head0.246
Teacher spread0.216 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2019
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueUniversity of Regina Press eBooksSame topicIndigenous Health, Education, and RightsFrench-language works237,207