Bibliographic record
Abstract
At the turn of the twentieth century, Saskatchewan often was a lonely place, dominated by vast farmlands and buffeted by an unpredictable climate.For the thousands of settlers who came to Saskatchewan to build new lives, the seemingly endless prairie took great courage to homestead.It also took something else-the capacity to dream, and dream "big." Joe Phelps personified these characteristics.His contribution to building Saskatchewan and Canada is an important demonstration of what big dreams can achieve.Joe Phelps came of age during a time of great adversity.He arrived in Saskatchewan from Ontario in 1909 to join his father, who had come earlier in pursuit of new opportunities.Unpredictable weather, stormy grain markets, and large distances posed constant challenges to the hopes of the Phelps family and to the residents of the province.While Joe's older brother fought in the First World War and his father fell into a period of depression, the younger Phelps took on the responsibility of operating a farm and the numerous associated challenges.He also quickly came to understand the fragility of what was, then, a one-commodity provincial economy.That fragility was further underlined by the impact of the Great Depression of 1929.It was this Great Depression that fuelled Joe Phelps's belief that unbridled free enterprise and unrestrained capitalism exacerbated the economic devastation by their inability to deal fairly with the unconscionable and rising levels of economic and social inequity.Thus, he grew to strongly believe that government and local co-operative initiatives, led by ordinary citizens, would produce the economic diversification necessary to lessen the province's economic dependency on the wheat economy, while also implementing important and positive reforms to the capitalist system.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".