LOW-COST CLOUD-BASED HD-MAP UPDATES FOR INFRASTRUCTURE MANAGEMENT AND MAINTENANCE
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract. Recently, HD maps have various merits for achieving the highest level of self-localization accuracy, keeping track of the state of the road infrastructure and maintenance, and providing an indication if any repairs are required. Therefore, it is essential to keep the HD map up to date. However, the process of updating the HD map is exorbitant because the HD map is created using expensive sensor setups, and updating the map frequently via these setups will be costly. In this paper, a full pipeline is proposed for updating the HD map via a crowdsourced dataset that is collected with low-cost smartphone sensors. Furthermore, an Android application is developed and installed on a smartphone to collect the raw data. Once the dataset is collected from the area of interest, it will be uploaded automatically to the cloud server that is connected to the HD map database. Then, object detection, depth estimation, and matching algorithms are triggered on the cloud server to keep updating the HD map database. The positions of the detected objects from the crowdsourced dataset are estimated by using fused outputs of deep learning models and the Global navigation satellite system (GNSS) of a smartphone and then compared with the objects in the HD map through matching algorithms. The proposed model is considered the first comprehensive pipeline approach for updating HD maps with high a cost-effective and efficient solution.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".