Implementasi Kepatuhan Iran terhadap Protokol Montreal melalui Program HCFC Phase-Out Management Plan (HPMP) Tahun 2017-2021
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The Montreal Protocol is an International Environmental Agreement that regulates the protection of the ozone layer by controlling the use of Ozone Depleting Substances (ODS). HCFC is type of ODS which is regulated under the Annex C of the protocol and must be phased-out by parties. Iran is one of the countries that ratified the Montreal Protocol and is obliged to comply with the implementation of the agreement. However, Iran's consumption of HCFCs is reasonably high, resulting a very significant increase in air temperature. This study aims to answer the question on how to implement Iran's compliance with the Montreal Protocol in reducing HCFC consumption. The theory used in this research is the compliance theory by Ronald B. Mitchell to analyze Iran's compliance with the protocol through 3 indicators namely, output, outcome, and impact. This is descriptive qualitative reseacrh with data obtained from literature study. This research results that changes in Iranian behavior are well achieved through the implementation of the HCFC Phase-out Management Plan program. The behavior changes emerged since HPMP involves 4 main areas specifically, training, HCFC conversion, awareness raising, and financial assistance.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it