MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4389725893 · doi:10.4324/9781003356837-20

Climate change impacts on agriculture and barriers to adaptation technologies among rural farmers in Southwestern Nigeria

2023· book-chapter· en· W4389725893 on OpenAlexfundno aff
Ayansina Ayanlade, Isaac Ayo Oluwatimilehin, Oluwatoyin S. Ayanlade

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typebook-chapter
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicEnergy and Environment Impacts
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersTertiary Education Trust FundQueen Elizabeth ScholarsTexas Emerging Technology Fund
KeywordsAgricultureClimate changeGeographyClimate change adaptationAdaptation (eye)AgroforestryAgricultural economicsEnvironmental planningSocioeconomicsEnvironmental scienceEconomicsEcologyArchaeologyPsychology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This chapter examines climate change impacts and local adaptation options among rural farmers in southwestern Nigeria. Satellite climate datasets for rainfall and temperature from the 1980s to 2020 and a dataset including responses to a survey and focus group discussions were used. A case study of the impacts of climate change on cassava yields using correlation and multiple regressions is presented. The results show a relative increase in temperature, while rainfall showed large seasonal variations. Rainfall trends appear to be relatively upwards from the 1980s – early 1990s but below the normal trend from the period from 1997 to 2020. The results from the survey show that nearly 80% of the rural farmers perceived general changes in temperature and rainfall in recent years, while nearly 97% of them adopted changes in the planting date of some crops, as an adaptation option. The results further show a very strong relationship between cassava yields and rainfall in the growing seasons. The study concludes that there is a need for governments at all levels to encourage rain-fed agriculture and more agricultural research to improve crop yields as climate changes.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.504
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.017
GPT teacher head0.206
Teacher spread0.189 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations5
Published2023
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicEnergy and Environment ImpactsFrench-language works237,207