MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4389726137 · doi:10.12783/shm2023/37029

SATELLITE MULTISPECTRAL AND INFRARED IMAGERY ANALYSIS TO CONTEXTUALIZE BRIDGE STRUCTURAL HEALTH OBSERVATIONS – A STUDY OF THE SAMUEL DE CHAMPLAIN BRIDGE IN MONTREAL, CANADA

2023· article· en· W4389726137 on OpenAlexafffundabout
H. James Stewart, Daniel Cusson

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicStructural Health Monitoring Techniques
Canadian institutionsNational Research Council Canada
FundersNational Research Council CanadaInfrastructure CanadaTransport Canada
KeywordsRemote sensingInterferometric synthetic aperture radarMultispectral imageSynthetic aperture radarSatelliteSatellite imageryGeologyMeteorologyEnvironmental scienceGeographyEngineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In 2021-2022, two related validation studies were conducted on structural health monitoring of the Samuel de Champlain Bridge in the La Prairie Basin of the Saint Lawrence River near Montreal, Canada. In the first study, C-band satellite Interferometric Synthetic Aperture Radar (InSAR) observations of bridge line-ofsight thermal displacement measurements were compared to predicted values. A companion observational study of multispectral (MS) imagery assessed turbulent and flow features on the river’s surface that are indicative of changes in the riverbed morphology and used stereo MS imagery to derive river velocity vectors using a Particle Image Velocimetry (PIV) algorithm. This paper presents the preliminary findings of a follow-up study, in which timeseries of InSAR displacement observations at nine piers of the Samuel de Champlain Bridge were compared to water depth, ambient water surface temperature from satellite imagery, and ambient air temperature from a nearby in-situ weather station.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.012
Threshold uncertainty score0.084

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.002
Science and technology studies0.0020.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.042
GPT teacher head0.310
Teacher spread0.268 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2023
Admission routes3
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicStructural Health Monitoring TechniquesFrench-language works237,207