Computational design of experimentally validated multi-epitopes vaccine against hepatitis E virus: An immunological approach
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Hepatitis E virus (HEV) is one of the leading acute liver infections triggered by viral hepatitis. Patients infected with HEV usually recover and the annual death rate is negligible. Currently, there is no HEV licensed vaccine available globally. This study was carried out to design a multi-epitope HEV peptide-based vaccine by retrieving already experimentally validated epitopes from ViPR database leading to epitope prioritization. Epitopes selected as potential vaccine candidates were non-allergen, immunogenic, soluble, non-toxic and IFN gamma positive. The epitopes were linked together by AAY linkers and the linker EAAAK was used to join adjuvant with epitopes. Toll-like receptor (TLR)-4 agonist was used as an adjuvant to boost efficacy of the vaccine. Furthermore, codon optimization followed by disulfide engineering was performed to analyse the designed vaccine's structural stability. Computational modeling of the immune simulation was done to examine the immune response against the vaccine. The designed vaccine construct was docked with TLR-3 receptor for their interactions and then subjected to molecular dynamic simulations. The vaccine model was examined computationally towards the capability of inducing immune responses which showed the induction of both humoral and cell mediated immunity. Taken together, our study suggests an In-silico designed HEV based multi-epitope peptide-based vaccine (MEPV) that needs to be examined in the wet lab-based data that can help to develop a potential vaccine against HEV.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".