MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort

1536: ARDS OUTCOMES IN TRAUMA 2007-2019: COMPREHENSIVE PATIENT AND CENTER-LEVEL ANALYSIS

2023· article· en· W4389727827 on OpenAlexaff
Zhi Geng, Alexis M. Moren, Jason D. Christie, Nilam S. Mangalmurti, Nuala J. Meyer, M.G.S. Shashaty, Benjamin S. Abella, John J. Gallagher, Allyson M. Hynes, Pengxiang Li, Jason Nam, Daniela Schmulevich, Avery B. Nathens, Patrick M. Reilly, David Zonies, Lewis J. Kaplan, Jeremy W. Cannon

Bibliographic record

VenueCritical Care Medicine · 2023
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicTrauma and Emergency Care Studies
Canadian institutionsHealth Sciences CentreSunnybrook Health Science Centre
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineARDSTrauma centerIntensive care medicineEmergency medicineMedical emergencyInternal medicineRetrospective cohort studyLung

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Introduction: Acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) remains a significant complication in trauma survivors. Yet the epidemiology of ARDS in trauma remains incompletely characterized. We sought to define trends in ARDS incidence and the effect of temporal, patient, and center-level factors on outcomes with the hypothesis that ARDS independently predicts mortality. Methods: We conducted a retrospective cohort study of the American College of Surgeons National Trauma Databank from 2007-2019. All patients ≥18 years old on mechanical ventilation (MV) for ≥2 days were included, and patients with ARDS were compared to those without ARDS. A subgroup with 24-hour transfusion data was also identified. We created multivariable logistic regression models by year and adjusted for patient demographics, center characteristics, and blood products to identify factors associated with ARDS incidence and 30-day mortality. Results: Of 384,032 injured patients on MV, 34,251 (9%) developed ARDS with a significant decrease over the study period (28% in 2007 vs 4% in 2019, p< 0.001). Patient-level risk factors independently associated with ARDS were blunt injury (OR 1.30, 95%CI 1.25-1.35), sepsis (OR 2.22, 95%CI 2.12-2.33), pneumonia (OR 2.80, 95%CI 2.72-2.87), and acute kidney injury (AKI, OR 2.97, 95%CI 2.84-3.11). Crude ARDS mortality increased over the study period (2007, 15.6% vs 2019, 28.7%, p< 0.001), and after adjusting for significant differences, ARDS was independently associated with 30-day mortality (OR 1.25, 95%CI 1.21-1.30). Independent risk factors for 30-day mortality in patients with ARDS included head injury (OR 1.54, 95%CI 1.44-1.65), sepsis (OR 1.47, 95%CI 1.35-1.61), and AKI (OR 2.67, 95%CI 2.47-2.89). In the transfusion subset, 24-hour plasma (OR 1.02, 95%CI 1.00-1.03) and platelets (OR 1.03, 95%CI 1.01-1.05) were independently associated with ARDS. Patients with ARDS managed in PETAL/ELSO centers were less likely to die (OR 0.81, 95%CI 0.75-0.87). Conclusions: From 2007 to 2019, ARDS decreased significantly in trauma patients. Over the same time, mortality increased to nearly 30%, and after adjusting for other risks factors, ARDS was strongly associated with 30-day mortality. Future studies should examine modifiable patient and center-level factors to improve mortality in these high-risk patients.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.004
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.034
Threshold uncertainty score0.068

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.004
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.003
Bibliometrics0.0030.006
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.061
GPT teacher head0.370
Teacher spread0.308 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2023
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCritical Care Medicine→Same topicTrauma and Emergency Care Studies→French-language works237,207→