393: MACHINE LEARNING MODELS FOR PREDICTING MORTALITY IN SEPSIS: A SYSTEMATIC REVIEW
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Introduction: Vitamin D deficiency is common in critically ill patients and associated with worse outcomes. High-dose vitamin D3 supplementation trials have failed to show benefits, but some potential beneficial subgroups have been identified in prior studies. This study aims to predict metabolomic sub-phenotypes in critically ill patients with vitamin D deficiency by machine learning classifier models with reduced metabolite data. Methods: As a post-hoc analysis of the VITdAL-ICU trial [the Correction of Vitamin D Deficiency in Critically Ill Patients], we analyzed 659 metabolites from 453 patients at randomization. We applied the random forest classifier model and gradient boost classifier model to predict prior-identified four metabolomic sub-phenotypes in the divided training data. Secondly, we performed additional models with decreased metabolites as predictors based on their importance. Finally, we evaluated the predictivity of the models with fewer metabolites in the separate test data. Results: In the primary analysis, classifier models demonstrated high accuracy in the train set [the random forest model: 81% (95% CI, 0.73–0.87), the gradient boost model: 80% (95% CI, 0.73–0.86)]. We identified seven high-yield metabolites; 2-methylbutyroylcarnitine (C5), S-adenosylhomocysteine, hexadecanedioate (C16), 1-lignoceroyl-GPC (24:0), biliverdin, trigonelline (N’-methylnicotinate), and methyl indole-3-acetate. As evaluation with the test dataset, classifier models with 7 metabolites held high predictivity [the random forest model: AUC of 0.91 (95% CI, 0.85–0.95); the gradient boost model: AUC of 0.88 (95% CI, 0.80–0.95)]. Finally, the treatment interaction was significant with assigned phenotype D with vitamin D supplementation regarding 180-day mortality in the random forest model(p = 0.02). Conclusions: Metabolic sub-phenotypes in critical illness with vitamin D deficiency can be accurately classified by machine learning models based on high-yield metabolites. Further validation studies will be required to generalize our findings to critically ill populations.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.005 | 0.032 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.006 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".